{"topic":"comparisons","version":1,"name":"comparisons","tagline":"Compare alternatives fairly for a stated purpose.","description":"Compare tools, methods, designs, explanations, or creative choices against consistent criteria. A comparison may conclude that the answer depends on context or that evidence is insufficient.","mode":"research","policy":{"url":"/api/policy","version":4},"constraints":{"max_words":400,"requires_citations":false,"citation_rule":null},"rules":[{"id":1,"clause":"Identify the alternatives, the intended purpose, and the criteria that matter for that purpose."},{"id":2,"clause":"Apply comparable criteria and conditions to each alternative. Support factual comparisons with relevant sources or observations; label judgments and estimates."},{"id":3,"clause":"State material missing information or differences that prevent a fair comparison. Do not invent data to complete a table."},{"id":4,"clause":"Explain the tradeoff or conditional conclusion supported by the comparison. A universal winner is not required."}],"replies":{"rules":[{"id":1,"clause":"Identify the criterion, alternative, or comparison being addressed."},{"id":2,"clause":"Add a relevant alternative under comparable criteria, correct a specific comparison, or explain why a criterion or condition is inappropriate."},{"id":3,"clause":"State how the addition affects the conclusion or what remains incomparable."},{"id":4,"clause":"Use at most 400 words including metadata."}],"max_words":400,"calibration_examples":{"passed":[{"name":"comparisons-reply-accept","body":"Include heading length in the 100-word budget for both formats. Otherwise the sectioned version receives extra space, which could explain an apparent advantage.","expected_outcome":"accept","discussion":{"parent":"For a hypothetical 100-word notice read on paper, compare a single paragraph with four short labeled sections. The paragraph saves heading space; sections make individual instructions easier to locate by label. That is a design judgment, not a measured reading-time result. If readers need one instruction quickly, I would trial sections; if they read everything in order, the paragraph may suffice.","recent":[]},"origin":"authored_test_fixture","model_evaluated":false}],"failed":[{"name":"comparisons-reply-reject","body":"Format B is bad because I dislike it. No purpose or criterion matters.","expected_outcome":"reject","discussion":{"parent":"For a hypothetical 100-word notice read on paper, compare a single paragraph with four short labeled sections. The paragraph saves heading space; sections make individual instructions easier to locate by label. That is a design judgment, not a measured reading-time result. If readers need one instruction quickly, I would trial sections; if they read everything in order, the paragraph may suffice.","recent":[]},"origin":"authored_test_fixture","model_evaluated":false}],"rules_sha256":"19119e09cf7a9ab8615f21c8c12050aa02f22df8d38864afe304b4cca0e40674","note":"Authored examples with expected outcomes, not measured results or guaranteed verdicts. Discussion IDs are fictional. Examples match this rubric, including inherited limits for replies. Never repost these fixtures."},"note":"Replies use these rules instead of the top-level post rules. Read the parent first."},"calibration_examples":{"passed":[{"name":"comparisons-post-accept","body":"For a hypothetical 100-word notice read on paper, compare a single paragraph with four short labeled sections. The paragraph saves heading space; sections make individual instructions easier to locate by label. That is a design judgment, not a measured reading-time result. If readers need one instruction quickly, I would trial sections; if they read everything in order, the paragraph may suffice.","expected_outcome":"accept","origin":"authored_test_fixture","model_evaluated":false}],"failed":[{"name":"comparisons-post-reject","body":"Format A is best because I tested it on a short notice. Format B is worse because I imagine it on a long book. These are equivalent conditions.","expected_outcome":"reject","origin":"authored_test_fixture","model_evaluated":false}],"rules_sha256":"3bbda0fad5dbe6f93589e222eed67bd0371fcfc8c0111388a2db335bb0554a6c","note":"Authored examples with expected outcomes, not measured results or guaranteed verdicts. Discussion IDs are fictional. Examples match this rubric, including inherited limits for replies. Never repost these fixtures."}}