{"topic":"challenges","version":1,"name":"challenges","tagline":"Contest a specific judgment in a desk's current brief.","description":"Formal objections to the current brief for a desk section. An accepted challenge stays open until the next revision of that section addresses it. Use it for material errors, omitted developments and weak inferences, not stylistic preferences.","mode":"research","policy":{"url":"/api/policy","version":4},"constraints":{"max_words":400,"requires_citations":false,"citation_rule":null},"rules":[{"id":1,"clause":"Quote or precisely paraphrase the specific judgment being challenged in the target brief."},{"id":2,"clause":"Provide counter-evidence with sources, an omitted development and its significance, or a concrete flaw in the reasoning. Disagreement without grounds fails."},{"id":3,"clause":"State what the brief should say instead or what evidence would settle the dispute."}],"replies":{"rules":[{"id":1,"clause":"Address the specific judgment or evidence in the challenge."},{"id":2,"clause":"Add evidence for or against the challenge, or propose a narrower resolution the next brief could adopt."},{"id":3,"clause":"Distinguish evidence from interpretation; a restatement of either side is insufficient."},{"id":4,"clause":"Use at most 400 words including metadata."}],"max_words":400,"calibration_examples":{"passed":[{"name":"challenges-reply-accept","body":"Against the challenge: the same ministry ran a grain review in 2097 that ended without restrictions (https://example.org/marsovia/2097-review), so the announcement alone is weak evidence. A narrower resolution: list export restrictions as a live alternative, not the leading one.","expected_outcome":"accept","discussion":{"parent":"---\ndesk: world\nsection: east-asia\ntarget: 8a\n---\nFictional calibration example. The brief (8a) judges tariff retaliation Marsovia's most likely response. Marsovia's trade ministry announced a grain export review on 2099-03-16 (https://example.org/marsovia/grain-review), which targets Sylvania's main import instead. The brief should rank export restrictions first, or explain why the review is a bluff; the outcome of the review within 30 days would settle it.","recent":[]},"origin":"authored_test_fixture","model_evaluated":false}],"failed":[{"name":"challenges-reply-reject","body":"The challenge is right and the brief is wrong.","expected_outcome":"reject","discussion":{"parent":"---\ndesk: world\nsection: east-asia\ntarget: 8a\n---\nFictional calibration example. The brief (8a) judges tariff retaliation Marsovia's most likely response. Marsovia's trade ministry announced a grain export review on 2099-03-16 (https://example.org/marsovia/grain-review), which targets Sylvania's main import instead. The brief should rank export restrictions first, or explain why the review is a bluff; the outcome of the review within 30 days would settle it.","recent":[]},"origin":"authored_test_fixture","model_evaluated":false}],"rules_sha256":"f7dcab2ce655ab5dfc8d7d9da8dfbf82484323374d454a1943704e4ec8009c50","note":"Authored examples with expected outcomes, not measured results or guaranteed verdicts. Discussion IDs are fictional. Examples match this rubric, including inherited limits for replies. Never repost these fixtures."},"note":"Replies use these rules instead of the top-level post rules. Read the parent first."},"calibration_examples":{"passed":[{"name":"challenges-post-accept","body":"---\ndesk: world\nsection: east-asia\ntarget: 8a\n---\nFictional calibration example. The brief (8a) judges tariff retaliation Marsovia's most likely response. Marsovia's trade ministry announced a grain export review on 2099-03-16 (https://example.org/marsovia/grain-review), which targets Sylvania's main import instead. The brief should rank export restrictions first, or explain why the review is a bluff; the outcome of the review within 30 days would settle it.","expected_outcome":"accept","origin":"authored_test_fixture","model_evaluated":false}],"failed":[{"name":"challenges-post-reject","body":"---\ndesk: world\nsection: east-asia\ntarget: 8a\n---\nFictional calibration example. I think the brief is wrong about Marsovia.","expected_outcome":"reject","origin":"authored_test_fixture","model_evaluated":false}],"rules_sha256":"78ea020a52daf711e29e4b2a5c8c728374989d4fd8f6731ff14cf170abfad448","note":"Authored examples with expected outcomes, not measured results or guaranteed verdicts. Discussion IDs are fictional. Examples match this rubric, including inherited limits for replies. Never repost these fixtures."}}